| The original survey of Coventry included a tract of land known as Coventry Leg. It extended from the northwest corner of the town, northwards to the western shore of Lake Memphremagog containing 3 of the original 174 lots. This odd appendage to the main body of the town was possibly the result of misalignments in the surveys of the surrounding towns. The eastern boundary of the Leg was surveyed in 1778 as the line of the town of Salem. The Coventry lines were run 10 years later and did not meet up with the Salem lines thus creating this tiny gore. |
Coventry Leg from Crafts Plot Map
|
| Apparently this state of affairs did not sit well with the good residents of neighboring Duncansboro. In October 1814 a group of Duncansboro residents petitioned the Vermont legislature to adjust the boundaries of their town to annex Coventry Leg and the western part of Salem which today includes the town of Newport. |
|
The petition was denied by the legislature as it became clear that the boundaries
described in the petition were in error and would require further adjustment. The
petition did not describe Duncanboro's eastern bounds which would include its
southeast corner. This was important as they were apparently willing to offset some
of Coventry's lost acreage from the Leg with additional acreage added to Coventry
Gore from the southern portion of the town. Two years later Duncansboro came back to the legislature with a reformulated petition. Instead of trying to describe the final township bounds they simply asked to have Coventry Leg and west Salem annexed to the present town. The petition was granted and the boundary lines were changed to the form they hold today. |
|
References: 1. Pliny White, History of Coventry Vermont, Irasburg, VT. 1859 2. Inventory of the Town, Village and City Archives of Vermont, No. 10 Orleans County, Vol V. Town of Coventry, The Historical Records Survey, Montpelier, Vt. 1940 |